I offer my latest thoughts on this, in a nutshell.
God
is an emergent property in the universe, a property that alternately
fertilizes and prunes us (and everything else: things come together and fall apart). We imagine him like us
for the same reason that we imagine animals with human emotions (and
other human features: sometimes our imagination is closer to truth than
other times, but the point is that we naturally see things in terms of
ourselves, all the time). The modern craze for science imagines God in
terms of human rational intelligence (we can read the nature of order in
the universe and understand it through applications of a sacred ritual
known as "the scientific method"). Science is just a modern kind of
religion, with new high priests, new myths, new values to offer those
with aptitude and interest.
Note
that I am liberal in my usage of the word modern. The genesis of
science as a rational imagination of the power(s) that control(s) the
universe starts pretty early (at least as early as the first
philosophers and theologians who attempt to make the world a
fundamentally rational thing, e.g. Aristotle).
Keep
in mind as you evaluate my thoughts above that every historical religion
produces all kinds of different strands (competing heresies) within an
over-arching ideology that all share (and contend to dominate: each
heresy competes to become the one true orthodoxy). Not all acolytes
advocate that we worship science the same way.
Somebody
like me will always find some heresies to like (in science as in
Christianity, Islam, or Buddhism) and some to despise. I love some
parts of the new religion (science? scientism?) and loathe other parts
(the same as I do with Mormonism or any other -ism that has an
historical tradition: I refuse to worship uncritically at any altar constructed by human hands).
No comments:
Post a Comment