The
power of degrees to draw salaries wanes as more people obtain degrees:
this is one viable lesson that they still teach in economics, though
many PhDs seem to have missed it (or to think that creative mathematics
can make it disappear, more or less the same way astrology used to
correct character flaws).
What
matters more than "education" is the right kind of education (i.e.
training in a viable, sustainable method of living). Given our current
circumstances, this sort of education is really unpopular: it does not
put money or influence or raw power into the hands of established
interests (who consequently found few institutions to teach it, endow
few scholarships or professorships to facilitate it, and use whatever
political and social clout they possess generally to mock and undermine
it). The right kind of education requires a student able to imagine
living a life unlike that of his parents (or the rich people of his
parents' generation, whose mores he is constantly bombarded with as
desirable insofar as they make him easier for established interests to
manipulate--via debts, social obligations, and desire for "nice things"
made in a sweatshop somewhere). It requires radical freedom of
thought--not the kind of regimented bean-counting that stops short of
articulating any idea remotely threatening to established interests (who
understandably position themselves as pillars of social and political
and economic stability, even as history reveals that they are built upon
sand that is shifting as we speak).
Real
education involves living, not just thinking. It cannot come from a
classroom, not even when that classroom has been outfitted with all the
best technology that a committee of experts can imagine and acquire.
Real education teaches us how to adapt and survive along an entire
lifetime--and beyond. (One utility of studying history is that it reminds you of a time when people didn't think in terms of single generations, let alone market and election cycles measured in terms of a few months or years.) Real education does not teach us how to get and maintain jobs in a narrow
market defined by scarcity and fragility. It teaches us how to
maximize independence rather than servility. It costs a lot in terms of
effort, and little in terms of cash (the reverse of many degrees
offered by modern universities). It incentivizes process over
completion, independence over employment, integrity over profit, and
virtuous failure over depraved success.
No comments:
Post a Comment